Ahhhh, he meant the clear tail lights. Haha Thanks, I have been doing a bunch of research and just havn't heard them called "black tail lights" before. But in any case I stand by my decision the clear lens tail lights look great! Plus they come with the S model anyways so I am in the clear.
well, it would be easier to smoke the clear lenses then it would the red ones. As a matter of fact you could disassemble them and have the insides tinted. Then once you put them back together you would have a really nice smoked look without having to go over the red lense.
nah, you can see it pretty good there. Those look good. I am still like the clear ones. I wouldn't like them if they looked like those ricer lights that you pick up at the auto parts/gorcery store that every kid with an eclipse/Integra puts on thier car, I REALLY don't like those. But the 3's are clean looking and don't overly stand out from the car. I don't think you can go wrong with this car either way you choose, they both look pretty nice.
yea i don't quite like the altezza light look that those people with civics and integras and even some accords like to do. Since they also come with a carbonfiber/gunmetal look rather than the standard silver, that might be why i'm turned away from the clear lenses.
The new lexus suv also come with clear all black taillights and i don't like those at all either.
Maybe, because I know if they looked anything like that or reminded me of them I wouldn't go anywhere near them. I guess when I saw them they reminded me more of the RX-8's totally kick rule all tail lights and thats why I like them.
A forum community dedicated to Mazda 3 and all Mazda vehicle owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about MazdaSpeed performance, modifications, classifieds, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!