OK, this explains
alot. This guy must be smoking something with some pretty strong hallucienagenic properties if he
seriously thinks that he is qualified to write valid "reports" on cars.
He just pisses me off. :evil:
Quoting his FAQ:
Q: You does not work in automotive field. You even don't drive. You are not qualified for writing about cars.
A: Well, read my news and reports and make your own judgement. Do you know some soccer coaches do not play soccer ?
I have made my own judgement and Mark Wan is
full of crap. I certainly don't give credit to "armchair" critics. Techincal analysis skills my butt. What kind of reviews is he supposedly reading to give the Mazda 3 such a bad "report"? All the reviews (from valid automotive publications) I've read had nothing but praise for the new Mazda 3. For example, from pulblications such as Road & Track, Car & Driver, Sport Compact Car, Edmunds.com, nctd.com (New Car Test Drive), CanadianDriver.com just to name a few.
Q: Do you need partners ?
A: Until now I can still handle all things. Moreover, I am not quite good at cooperation
Well, really now? Maybe if he got a editor proficient in the English language and who is a
real driving enthusiast who actually
drove a car, his "reports" may carry some weight.
I take back everything I said in my previous post on this thread. I didn't even know that Mark Wan didn't drive cars before writing his "reports". If Mark Wan is reading this, I suggest you get a new hobby and do something more valid and constructive with your "technical analysis" skills.